High Dose Fish Oil Added to Various Lipid Emulsions Normalizes Superoxide Dismutase 1 Activity in Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients.

(1) Objectives: Intestinal failure in home parenteral nutrition patients (HPNPs) results in oxidative stress and liver damage. This study investigated how a high dose of fish oil (FO) added to various lipid emulsions influences antioxidant status and liver function markers in HPNPs. (2) Methods: Twelve HPNPs receiving Smoflipid for at least 3 months were given FO (Omegaven) for a further 4 weeks. Then, the patients were randomized to subsequently receive Lipoplus and ClinOleic for 6 weeks or vice versa plus 4 weeks of Omegaven after each cycle in a crossover design. Twelve age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were included. (3) Results: Superoxide dismutase (SOD1) activity and oxidized-low-density lipoprotein concentration were higher in all baseline HPN regimens compared to HCs. The Omegaven lowered SOD1 compared to baseline regimens and thus normalized it toward HCs. Lower paraoxonase 1 activity and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) concentration and, on the converse, higher alkaline phosphatase activity and cholesten concentration were observed in all baseline regimens compared to HCs. A close correlation was observed between FGF19 and SOD1 in baseline regimens. (4) Conclusions: An escalated dose of FO normalized SOD1 activity in HPNPs toward that of HCs. Bile acid metabolism was altered in HPNPs without signs of significant cholestasis and not affected by Omegaven.

An Overview of Parenteral Nutrition from Birth to Adolescence Based on a Composite Fish Oil Containing Lipid Emulsion and a Pediatric Amino Acid Solution.

Intestinal failure (IF) is characterized by a critical reduction in functional gut mass below the minimum needed for optimal growth in children. It requires parenteral nutrition (PN) and home-PN (HPN), which is challenging in terms of meeting nutritional needs according to age, growth velocity, clinical situation, and rapid changes in fluid and electrolyte requirements. Due to these complex requirements, age-adapted multi-chamber bags (MCBs) are important additions to the nutrition armamentarium. The launch of composite fish oil (FO)-containing intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs) heralded the development of MCBs containing these ILEs in combination with a crystalline amino acid solution adapted for pediatric use. The safety and efficacy of lipid and amino acid components in this context have been widely documented in numerous published studies. This narrative manuscript includes a review of the articles published in PudMed, Embase, and Google Scholar up to June 2023 for the age groups of term infants to children and adolescents. Preterm infants with their highly specific demands are not included. It aims to offer an overview of the clinical experience regarding the use of a composite FO-based ILE and a developed specific amino acid solution.

Ready-to-Use Multichamber Bags in Home Parenteral Nutrition for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is increasingly prescribed for patients with advanced cancer. This therapy improves free-fat mass, quality of life and survival, but it is not free from complications, especially catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). The use of commercial multichamber bags in HPN has not been extensively explored in oncologic patients and their association with complications is not well known. In this prospective cohort study, we included 130 patients with advanced cancer and HPN. We compared the effects of individual compounded bags (n = 87) vs. commercial multichamber bags (n = 43) on complications. There were no differences in any complication, including thrombosis (p > 0.05). There were 0.28 episodes of CRBSI per 1000 catheter days in the individual compounded bag group and 0.21 in the multichamber bag group (p > 0.05). A total of 34 patients were weaned off HPN, 22 with individual bags and 12 with multichamber bags (p = 0.749). Regarding survival when on HPN, the group with individual bags showed a median of 98 days (95% CI of 49-147), whereas those with multichamber bags showed a median of 88 days (95% CI of 43-133 (p = 0.913)). In conclusion, commercial multichamber bags for HPN in patients with advanced cancer are non-inferior when compared to individual compounded bags in terms of complications.

Nutritional care pathways in cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction: A retrospective multi-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: Variation in access to parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients with intestinal failure secondary to malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) exists due to differing practice, beliefs and resource access. We aimed to examine differences in nutritional care pathways and outcomes, by referral to nutrition team for PN in patients with MBO. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of MBO adults admitted to eight UK hospitals within a year and 1 year follow-up. Demographic, nutritional and medical data were analysed by comparing patients referred (R) or not referred (NR) for PN. Differences between groups were tested by Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-Squared tests and multi-level regression and survival using Cox regression. RESULTS: 232 patients with 347 MBO admissions [median 66yr, (IQR: 55-74yrs), 67 % female], 79/232 patients were referred for PN (R group). Underlying primary malignancies of gynaecological and gastrointestinal origin predominated (71 %) and 78 % with metastases. Those in the NR group were found to be older, weigh more on admission, and more likely to be treated conservatively compared to those in the R group. For 123 (35 %) admissions, patients were referred to a nutrition team, and for 204 (59 %) admissions, patients were reviewed by a dietician. Multi-disciplinary team discussion and dietetic contact were more likely to occur in the R group-123/347 admissions (R vs NR group: 27 % vs. 7 %, P = 0.001; 95 % vs 39 %, P < 0.0001). Median admission weight loss was 8 % (IQR: 0 to 14). 43/123 R group admissions received inpatient PN only, with 32 patients discharged or already established on home parenteral nutrition. Overall survival was 150 days (126-232) with no difference between R/NR groups. CONCLUSION: In this multi-centre study evaluating nutritional care management of patients with malignant bowel obstruction, only 1 in 3 admissions resulted in a referral to the nutrition team for PN, and just over half were reviewed by a dietician. Further prospective research is required to evaluate possible consequences of these differential care pathways on clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Iron overload in patients with Crohn's disease with short bowel syndrome who received long-term parenteral nutrition with trace elements.

Crohn's disease patients often need regular home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for intestinal failure due to multiple intestinal resections. Trace elements are necessary for long-term HPN but the requirement volume of iron is undetermined. We describe three patients with Crohn's disease with short bowel syndrome (SBS) who had iron overload as a result of long-term HPN including iron. Serum ferritin level was significantly decreased through depleting intravenous iron administration in all cases. One patient needed regular insulin injection and phlebotomy for diabetes mellitus due to hemochromatosis, and intravenous iron administration had a significant impact on the patient's health. Long-term routine intravenous iron administration should be cautious in SBS patients to avoid the overload.

[Home parenteral nutrition in patients with malignant bowel obstruction. Ethical considerations]. / Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna. Consideraciones éticas.

Introduction: Background: patients with cancer are one of the main group of patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) represent a challenging group when considering HPN. At the Ethics Working Group of SENPE ethical considerations on this subject were reviewed and a guidelines proposal was made. Methods: a literature search was done and a full set of questions arose: When, if ever, is HPN indicated for patients with MBO? How should the training program be? When withdrawal of HPN should be considered? Other questions should be also taken into consideration. May any Oncologist send home a patient with HPN? The educational program could be shortened? When considering to withdraw parenteral nutrition? Results: HPN in MBO has better outcomes when patients have a good functional status (Karnofsky ≥ 50 or ECOG ≤ 2), expected survival > 2-3 months, and low inflammatory markers. Very few data have been reported on quality of life, but HPN allows a valuable time at home albeit with a considerable burden for both patients and their families. Proposal: once a patient is considered for HPN, there is a need for a deep talk on the benefits, complications and risks. In this initial talk, when HNP should be stopped needs to be included. The palliative care team with the help of the nutrition support team should follow the patient, whose clinical status must be assessed regularly. HPN should be withdrawn when no additional benefits are achieved. Conclusion: HPN may be considered an option in patients with MBO when they have a fair or good functional status and a desire to spend their last days at home.

Introducción: Introducción: los pacientes con cáncer constituyen uno de los principales grupos de pacientes dentro de los programas de nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD). Existe un grupo de pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna (OIM) en quienes el uso de la NPD es controvertido. Desde el Grupo de Ética de la SENPE se revisan las cuestiones éticas detrás de la decisión de iniciar la NPD en un paciente con OIM y se propone una propuesta de acción. Método: se procedió a hacer una revisión crítica de la literatura, tras la cual se diseñaron las preguntas que este documento pretendía responder: ¿Está indicado el uso de la NPD en pacientes con OIM? ¿En qué situaciones? Quedarían otros aspectos que también merecen una reflexión: ¿Cualquier oncólogo puede enviar a un paciente a su domicilio con NPD? ¿Debe ser el programa de formación de los cuidados en la NPD igual que el referente a los pacientes con fracaso intestinal de causa benigna? ¿Se debe suspender la NPD en algún momento? Resultados: la NPD en pacientes con OIM consigue mejores resultados en aquellos con una buena situación funcional (índice de Karnofsky ≥ 50 o ECOG ≤ 2), con un pronóstico vital superior a 2-3 meses e, idealmente, con niveles de marcadores inflamatorios bajos. En los escasos trabajos publicados en los que se valoran las ventajas sobre la calidad de vida, se concluye que la NPD permite a los pacientes disponer de un tiempo valioso en su domicilio pero a costa de una carga significativa para ellos mismos y sus familias. Propuesta de acción: una vez considerado como candidato a la NPD, se debe tener una conversación abierta con el paciente y sus familiares en la que se aborden los beneficios potenciales, las implicaciones prácticas y los riesgos. En esa conversación inicial debe también plantearse en qué momento considerar la retirada de la NPD. El responsable de la NPD es el equipo de soporte domiciliario en colaboración con el de nutrición clínica. La situación clínica debe evaluarse de forma periódica de manera que, cuando la NPD no proporcione ningún beneficio adicional, se plantee su retirada, manteniendo el resto de medidas de tratamiento sintomático paliativo. Conclusión: la NPD puede constituir una opción de tratamiento paliativo en pacientes con OIM con buena capacidad funcional y un deseo manifiesto de disponer de más tiempo en su domicilio en los últimos estadios de su enfermedad.

High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low (< 1 g/kg bodyweight/day), standard (1-1.5 g/kg/day), and high-protein doses (> 1.5 g/kg/day). METHODS: Literature searches were performed on 5th October 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and five Cochrane Library and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Searches were complemented by hand-searching of conference proceedings, a clinical trial registry, and bibliographic reference lists of included studies and relevant SLRs/meta-analyses. RESULTS: Nineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day. CONCLUSION: At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.

Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with intestinal failure undergoing home parenteral nutrition: a single-center study.

PURPOSE: The incidence and risk factors of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients with intestinal failure (IF) have not been established, partly because catheter management methods vary from different facilities. This study aimed to identify the risk factors and incidence rate of CRBSIs in patients with IF who were given prophylactic treatment. METHODS: Sixteen patients with IF who required home parenteral nutrition were enrolled in this study. Prophylactic management of CRBSI included monthly ethanol lock therapy and standardized infection prevention education. The outcomes included the incidence and risk factors of CRBSI. RESULTS: The median incidence rate of CRBSI was 1.2 per 1000 catheter days. Univariate analysis showed that the risk of developing CRBSI was significantly associated with short bowel syndrome (< 30 cm) (p = 0.016). Other relevant findings included a significant negative correlation between serum albumin and CRBSI rate (r = - 0.505, p = 0.046), and past history of mixed bacterial infections was significantly associated with increased CRBSI rate (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: CRBSIs can still develop despite undergoing prophylactic management. Risk factors for CRBSI include the residual intestinal length, nutritional status, and susceptibility to certain microorganisms.

Feasibility of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Intestinal Failure Due to Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining adequate nutritional status can be a challenge for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Surgical resection could result in short bowel syndrome (SBS), whilst without surgical resection there is a considerable risk of ischemia or developing an inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (IMBO). SBS or IMBO are forms of intestinal failure (IF) which might require treatment with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Limited data exist regarding the use of HPN in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours, and it is not frequently considered as a possible treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was performed regarding patients with small bowel NETs and IF to report on overall survival and HPN-related complications and create awareness for this treatment. RESULTS: Five articles regarding patients with small bowel NETs or a subgroup of patients with NETs could be identified, mainly case series with major concerns regarding bias. The studies included 60 patients (range 1-41). The overall survival time varied between 0.5 and 154 months on HPN. However, 58% of patients were alive 1 year after commencing HPN. The reported catheter-related bloodstream infection rate was 0.64-2 per 1000 catheter days. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates the feasibility of the use of HPN in patients with NETs and IF in expert centres with a reasonable 1-year survival rate and low complication rate. Further research is necessary to compare patients with NETs and IF with and without HPN and the effect of HPN on their quality of life.

A one size vial does not fit all: An evaluation of the micronutrient status of adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with chronic intestinal failure require HPN. Previous studies have reported a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies. We examined the micronutrient status of our patients receiving. METHODS: We measured vitamins A, E, D, B12, Folate, Zinc, Selenium and Copper. Patients were excluded if they had undergone surgery or amendments in IV or oral micronutrient provision in the past six months. Blood samples were excluded if C-reactive protein was >15 mg/L. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on concentrations below normal to determine if clinical or demographic categories were significant. RESULTS: 93 samples were included (33 males:60 females). Samples were excluded due to surgery (n = 8) amendment in micronutrient provision (n = 42) or if C-reactive protein >15 mg/L (n = 18). Vitamins A, D and E were below normal in 26%, 33% and 13% of patients respectively. Lower vitamin A was more likely in patients >50 years (P = 0.02) and lower vitamin E was more likely in men (P = 0.02). No patients had low vitamin B12 or folate whereas 29% and 9% had concentrations above the normal range respectively. Zinc and selenium were below normal in 19% and 13% respectively. Patients with surgical complications were more likely to have lower zinc (P = 0.007) and selenium (P = 0.04). Lower zinc was more likely in patients with a BMI of >25 kg/m2 (P = 0.01) and those who received Additrace® ≤3 day/week (P = 0.06). DISCUSSION: Low and high concentrations were observed in our patients but clinical and demographic factors did not impact consistently on micronutrient concentrations highlighting the importance of ongoing monitoring and adequate supplementation as per ESPEN guidelines. Current micronutrient preparations may be inadequate for some patients with dependent on HPN. Our results indicate a need for a preparation with higher amounts of vitamin D.

Unexpected Serum and Urine Aluminum Concentrations in Pediatric Patients on Home Parenteral Nutrition.

The intravenous supply of aluminum (Al) present in parenteral nutrition solutions poses a high risk of the absorption of this element, which can result in metabolic bone disease, anemia, and neurological complications. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of long-term parenteral nutrition (PN) in children on serum Al concentration and its urinary excretion compared to healthy children. We evaluated serum Al concentrations and its urinary excretion in patients enrolled in the Polish home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program between 2004 and 2022. The study group included 83 patients and the control group consisted of 121 healthy children. In children whose PN was started in the neonatal period, we found higher serum Al concentrations and higher urinary Al excretion than in other subjects whose PN was started later. Only 12% of the children on chronic parenteral nutrition had serum Al concentrations of less than 5 µg/L. Healthy children in the control group had higher serum Al concentrations than those in the parenteral nutrition group, which may indicate the influence of one's environment and diet on Al serum levels.

Unexpected upper gastrointestinal polyps in patients with short bowel syndrome treated with teduglutide: need for close monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Teduglutide is a GLP-2 analog indicated for the treatment of short bowel syndrome (SBS) since 2015. Its efficacy in reducing parenteral nutrition (PN) has been shown in patients with SBS. OBJECTIVES: Because teduglutide is a trophic factor, the aim of this study was to assess risk of developing polypoid intestinal lesions during treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 35 patients with SBS treated with teduglutide for ≥1 y in a home PN expert center. All patients underwent ≥1 follow-up intestinal endoscopy during treatment. RESULTS: In the 35 patients, the small bowel length was 74 cm (IQR: 25-100), and 23 patients (66%) had a colon in continuity. Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed after a mean treatment duration of 23 mo (IQR: 13-27), and polypoid lesions were found in 10 patients (6 with a colon in continuity, 4 with an end jejunostomy) and no lesion in 25 patients. In 8 out of the 10 patients, the lesion was found in the small bowel. Five of these lesions presented an aspect of hyperplastic polyp without dysplasia, and 3 of a traditional adenoma with low-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the importance of performing follow-up upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in SBS patients treated with teduglutide and the potential need to make changes to the recommendations with respect to treatment initiation and follow-up.

Long term clinical outcomes of home parenteral nutrition in Singapore.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a life sustaining therapy for patients with chronic intestinal failure. Reported outcomes for Asian HPN patients are scarce. We aim to review the clinical outcomes of adult and paediatric HPN patients in our cohort which caters for 95% of Singaporean HPN patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of HPN patients from an adult (2002-2017) and paediatric cohort (2011-2017) from the largest tertiary PN centres in Singapore. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 41 adult and 8 paediatric HPN patients. Mean age was 53.0(±15.1) (adults) and 8(±1.8) years-old (paediatrics). Mean duration of HPN was 2.6(±3.5) and 3.5(±2.5) years. Leading indications for adult HPN were short bowel syndrome (SBS) (n=19,46.3%), mechanical obstruction (n=9,22.0%), and gastrointestinal dysmotility disorders (GID) (n=5,12.2%). Thirteen adult (31.7%) patients had underlying malignancy, with seven (17.3%) receiving palliative HPN. Indications for HPN amongst paediatric patients was GID (n=5,62.5%) and SBS (n=3,37.5%). Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI)/1000catheter-days was 1.0(±2.1) and 1.8(±1.3). Catheter associated venous thrombosis (CAVT)/1000catheter-days was 0.1(±0.4) and 0.7(±0.8). Biochemical Intestinal Failure Associated Liver Disease (IFALD) was found in 21.9% and 87.5%. For adults, median overall survival was 90-months (4.3,175.7,95%CI), with actuarial survival of 70.7%(1-year) and 39.0%(5-years). Median survival for adult patients with malignancy was 6-months (4.2,7.7,95%CI), actuarial survival of 85.7%(3-months) and 30.7%(1-year). One adult patient died from PN related complications. No paediatric deaths were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst patient numbers were modest, we report comparable complication and survival rates to other international centres in both our adult and paediatric cohorts.

Availability of palliative parenteral nutrition to patients with advanced cancer: A national survey of service provision.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancy who are unable to meet their nutritional requirements orally or enterally as a result of intestinal failure may be considered for parenteral nutrition support. Current UK guidance recommends that patients with a 3-month prognosis and good performance status (i.e., Karnofsky performance status >50) should be considered for this intervention at home (termed Home Parenteral Nutrition; HPN). However, HPN is a nationally commissioned service by National Health Service (NHS) England and Improvement that can only be initiated at specific NHS centres and so may not be easily accessed by patients outside of these centres. This survey aimed to identify current clinical practice across UK hospitals about how palliative parenteral nutrition is initiated. METHODS: Clinical staff associated with Nutrition Support Teams at NHS Organisations within the UK were invited to complete an electronically administered survey of national clinical practice through advertisements posted on relevant professional interest groups. RESULTS: Sixty clinicians responded to the survey administered between September and November 2020. The majority of respondents responded positively that decisions made to initiate palliative parenteral nutrition were conducted in alignment with current national guidance in relation to decision-making and formulation of parenteral nutrition. Variation was observed in relation to the provision of advance care planning in relation to nutrition support prior to discharge, as well as the consideration of venting gastrostomy placement in patients with malignant bowel obstruction unsuitable for surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to current national guidance in relation to the provision of palliative parenteral nutrition is variable for some aspects of care. Further work is required particularly in relation to maximising the opportunity for the provision of advance care planning prior to discharge in this patient cohort.

Outcomes and survival in patients with advanced intestinal neuroendocrine tumours on home parenteral nutrition, an international multicentre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Only limited information is available on the use of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) causing intestinal failure (IF). This study aims to report the outcomes of the explore the use of HPN in this patient cohort, in the largest case series to date. METHODS: A retrospective study in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands was performed, using the UK National British Artificial Nutrition Survey (BANS) and local databases in the Netherlands. Data regarding age, sex, NET grading, staging, treatment, HPN characteristics and survival outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Data were collected on 41 patients (n = 18 males, 44%) with a median age of 65. Most primary tumours were in the small bowel (n = 35, 85%). The NETs were Grade 1 (n = 16, 39%), Grade 2 (n = 7, 17%), Grade 3 (n = 1, 2%). In 28 patients (n = 68%) there was stage IV disease with metastases located in the peritoneum, mesentery and or liver. There were two indications for HPN; short bowel syndrome (n = 27, 66%) and inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (n = 14, 34%). The median period on HPN was 11 months (interquartile range 4-25 months). 11 patients were still alive and receiving HPN treatment after 2 years, and 6 patients after 3 years. Six patients (22%) with short bowel syndrome (SBS) could be weaned from HPN. There was a statistically significant improved survival for patients with short bowel syndrome (median 24 months) compared to inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (median 7 months). The catheter-related bloodstream infection rate was comparable to other HPN patient cohorts at 1.0 per 1000 catheter days. CONCLUSION: This study shows that HPN can be used safely in patients with NET and IF to increase survival beyond that reasonably expected in the context of either short bowel syndrome or inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. Patients with short bowel syndrome are most likely to benefit. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate survival benefits and to demonstrate the effect of HPN on quality of life.

Association between Karnofsky performance status and outcomes in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The selection of appropriate criteria is essential to accurately identify cancer patients eligible for home parenteral nutrition (HPN). In this study, the association between Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale scores and outcomes in cancer patients on HPN was evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective-observational-longitudinal-analytical study of a database of adult cancer patients on HPN. The variables analyzed were sex, age, cancer diagnosis, cancer location (digestive tract and genitourinary), nutritional status, including initial weight (IW), at the start of HPN), usual weight (UW) and IW/UW ratio, and body mass index (BMI) at the start of HPN. Performance status was assessed with the KPS scale. Type of catheter used, number of days on HPN and clinical progression of cancer patients were also studied. RESULTS: Data of 41 cancer patients (60.8% female) were evaluated. Mean age at the start of HPN was 60.45 years. Cancer location was digestive tract (n = 36; 87.8%); gynecologic (n = 4; 9.7%), urinary tract (n = 1; 2.4%). Median IW was 55 kg (45; 64) and BMI was 20 (17.58; 22.84). The IW/UW ratio was -15 kg (-20;-10). The catheters used were peripherally inserted central catheter (n = 30; 73.2%), tunneled (n = 9; 22%) and port (n = 2; 4.8%). The median duration of HPN was 72 days (30; 159). The KPS results showed that 16 cancer patients (39%) had KPS scores ≤50, 17 (41.5%) requiring HPN were discharged and 24 (58.5%) died. The association between disease progression and KPS scores ≤50 was significant (p = 0.025; OR (95% CI): 5.28 (1.07; 36.18). CONCLUSION: The KPS scale is a reliable tool to identify cancer patients eligible for HPN. Cancer patients with ≤50 scores had a five-fold increased risk of death than patients with >50 scores.

Long-term home parenteral nutrition in systemic sclerosis-related intestinal failure is feasible but unveils occult cardiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of long-term home parenteral nutrition between patients with systemic sclerosis and intestinal failure (IF) and controls with IF from another etiology. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a referral center for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in Montpellier, France. Patients followed between 1985 and 2020 with SSc-related IF were included and compared with control patients with IF from another etiology. The patients included had to be treated for ≥4 wk by home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Primary outcome was occurrence of HPN-related complications. Secondary outcomes included duration of parenteral nutrition, body mass index at 12 mo, and survival. RESULTS: Cumulative duration of HPN was 23 397 catheter days. HPN resulted in body mass index increase in both groups. There was no statistical difference regarding catheter-related bloodstream infections and thrombosis between the groups, despite use of immunosuppressive drugs and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with SSc. However, the patients with SSc had significantly more HPN-related cardiac overload than the controls (P < 0.0001). Overloads occurred in SSc patients with and without cardiac disease, arguing for comprehensive hemodynamic screening in this condition. CONCLUSION: Long-term HPN in SSc-related IF is feasible but unveils occult cardiac disease.

United Kingdom artificial nutrition database: The changing landscape of adult home parenteral support.

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom nutrition database monitors the changing landscape of adult home parenteral nutrition support (HPS) to inform clinicians and policy makers of the need for this life-saving treatment. METHODS: The UK database is administered by the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Data for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) has been collected since 2005 and home intravenous fluids (HIVFs) since 2011. During this study the reporting of data to the database by healthcare workers has been voluntary. Data were analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS: A threefold increase of new registrations for patients receiving HPS was noted on this 10-year period, with a notable increase in the number of patients with advanced malignancy supported with HPS. Crohn's disease and short bowel syndrome were the leading causes for both HPN and HIVF use in the UK. A statistically significant increase in older (P < 0.001) and less independent patients using HPS was noted. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HPS is steadily increasing in size with the broadening of its acceptable performance status. The launch of the Intestinal Failure Registry and mandatory registration will increase accuracy in data reporting.

[XIII Lección Jesús Culebras. Hospital pharmacists and nutritional support. From the beginning to the present day (1976- 2018)]. / XIII Lección Jesús Culebras. Los farmacéuticos de hospital y el soporte nutricional. De los inicios hasta nuestros días (1976-2018).

Introduction: Hospital pharmacists have been, since 1970's active members in nutritional support commissions [parenteral nutrition (NP) and enteral nutrition (EN)], in our hospitals, mainly in the context of sterile preparation of NP components. This presentation tries to explain their role in this 42-year journey. Without any doubt, in quality leap, in pharmaceutical quality in PN was the step from the preparation in individual vials to the "all-in-one" admixtures", thereby reducing catheter infections due to less handling. Three events occurred in the 1990´s., First, due to increase of NP preparations, the pharmaceutical industry designed three-chamber bags. Second, studies on hospital malnutrition, were launched after verifying that malnutrition increased surgical and medical complications. Finally, the Order of June 2, 1987 regulated Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN). In the first decade of the new century, the growth of patients who were candidates for PN continued. In the last 10 years, we have intensified our work into patients with short bowel with Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN), but above all in the control of ileostomies, after suture failure. and we placed order in the drugs that are stable in NP and in "Y" with it. We also started pharmacokinetics studies in the administration of drugs in different surgical situations: bariatric surgery, total gastrectomy... In the future we will continue to ask questions about how we can improve the nutritional support of our patients.

Introducción: Los farmacéuticos de hospitales fueron, desde los inicios en el decenio de los setenta del siglo pasado, miembros activos en las comisiones de soporte nutricional [nutrición parenteral (NP) y nutrición enteral (NE)], en nuestros hospitales, en el contexto principalmente de la preparación estéril de los componentes de NP. Sin duda, un salto de calidad farmacéutica en la NP, fue el paso de la preparación en frascos individuales al "todo en uno", ya que con ello se disminuían infecciones por catéter a causa de la menor manipulación. Ocurren 3 acontecimientos en la década de los noventa del siglo pasado, el primero, frente al alud de preparaciones de NP la industria farmacéutica irrumpe con una preparación de bolsas tricamerales. El segundo, los inicios de estudios de desnutrición hospitalaria, después de comprobar, que la malnutrición incrementaba las complicaciones quirúrgicas y médicas, y por último la Orden de 2 de junio de 1987 para regular la Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria. En el primer decenio del nuevo siglo continúa el crecimiento de enfermos candidatos a NP. Los últimos 10 años, hemos profundizado en los enfermos con intestino corto con Nutrición Parenteral Domiciliaria, pero sobre todo en el control de las ileostomías, tras fallo de sutura, y pusimos orden en los fármacos que son estables en la NP y en "Y" con la misma. También iniciamos estudios farmacocinéticos en la administración de fármacos en diferentes situaciones quirúrgicas: cirugía bariátrica, gastrectomía total… El futuro será continuando haciéndose preguntas sobre cómo podemos mejorar el soporte nutricional de nuestros pacientes.

Experience, decision-making and information needs around parenteral nutrition among people with advanced cancer, and their carers: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to summarise current knowledge and identify gaps in knowledge and research regarding experience, decision-making and information needs around parenteral nutrition, among people with advanced cancer, and their carers. METHODS: This review was informed by previous methods and guidance on conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A literature search was conducted in March 2021 using Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Google and Web of Science to identify studies that examined the experience, decision-making process and information needs of adults with advanced cancer, and their carers, who were making decisions around commencing and discontinuing parenteral nutrition. There were no date limitations, although only papers published in English were included. RESULTS: Of the 588 papers identified, 12 papers, all qualitative, met the eligibility criteria. Despite the reported negative aspects of home parenteral nutrition, patients and carers felt the benefits outweighed these. There was variability in whether patients and carers felt involved in decisions around commencing parenteral nutrition. No studies specifically addressed information needs. CONCLUSIONS: Research is required to explore the information that patients with advanced cancer, and their carers, need to facilitate their decision-making around commencing and discontinuing parenteral nutrition. We recommend the development of processes for obtaining written informed consent from patients commencing parenteral nutrition to ensure that core topics are discussed on initiation, enabling patients and carers to make informed decisions. Additionally, we recommend development of a national framework to inform patients and carers of the whole discharge process on PN from decision-making to discontinuing PN.